by late74C on Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:07 pm
I was almost in this situation a few years back, the company I'm with now was much quicker to do second interviews and make an offer, the first company had a slower process where I was strictly working through an out-of-town recruiter, still very good interviews in the first round, just longer to get decision makers. I simply didn't have enough time (with the written offer in hand) to 'push' the first company any faster to see if I were to get something better or more interesting. I did contact the recruiter and lay out the time frame I had to respond (always be honest with these guys, even though they may not do the same for you!) -- the company with the slower process wouldn't budge (all I was asking for was to move up the interview schedule) so I took the offer -- you always think about 'what if's' of course as the other company offered a company car, etc. but the end of the story is ... a few years later I interviewed and hired a BA from the company who had the slower hiring process, I found out more specifics about the role (the person I hired worked for the actual manager position I would have had!) and I made the best choice by far. Of course, this is hind sight as I didn't really have a true choice but it was nice to know when all was said and done. As one other has said, and you didn't explain further in your post, if you're out of work in this economy I would take it -- I've seen it written that typical IT posts are around 18 months so you could take it and ride out the storm until more opportunites are available.